ArticleHeliyon2024
Telomere-based risk models for the early diagnosis of lung cancer.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hallmarks of the ageing lung: 10 years later.The European respiratory journal · 2026Review
- Novel biomarkers for lung cancer diagnosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and metanalysis.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- PD-L1 expression scoring using artificial intelligence algorithms in non-small cell lung cancer harbouring ROS1 fusions: potential clinical-biological significance.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of telomere length measurements as diagnostic biomarkers during early screening for lung cancer in high-risk patients. Methods: This was a prospective study of patients undergoing lung cancer diagnosis at two Spanish hospitals between April 2017 and January 2020. Telomeres from peripheral blood lymphocytes were analysed by Telomere Analysis Technology, which is based in high-throughput quantitative fluorescent in situ hybridization. Analytical predictive models were developed using Random Forest from the dataset of telomere-associated variables (TAV). Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were used to characterize model performance. Findings: From 233 patients undergoing lung cancer diagnosis, 106 patients aged 55-75 with lung cancer or lung cancer and COPD were selected. A control group (N = 453) included individuals of similar age with COPD or healthy. Telomere analysis showed that patients in the cancer cohort had a higher proportion of short telomeres compared to the control cohort. A TAV-based predictive model assuming a prevalence of 5 % of lung cancer among screened subjects showed an AUC of 0.98 %, a positive predictive value of 0.60 (95 % CI, 0.49-0.70) and a negative predictive value of 0.99 (95 % CI, 0.98-0.99) for prediction of lung cancer. Interpretation: The results of this study suggest that TAV analysis in peripheral lymphocytes can be considered a useful diagnostic tool during screening for lung cancer in high-risk patients. TAV-based models could improve the predictive power of current initial diagnostic pathways, but further work is needed to integrate them into routine clinical evaluation. Funding: Life Length SL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.