Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759327›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Investigating the effect of geopolitical risk on defense companies' stock returns.

Catalin Gheorghe, Oana Panazan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catalin GheorgheDepartment of Engineering and Industrial Management, Transilvania University of Brașov, Brașov, Romania.
Oana PanazanDepartment of Engineering and Industrial Management, Transilvania University of Brașov, Brașov, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the influence of geopolitical risk (GPR) on the stock returns of 75 global representative defense companies. Our argument is based on the premise that the Crimean Peninsula's 2014 annexation was a turning point for the defense industry. The study uses wavelet coherence and phase differences to examine daily datasets spanning from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2023. We find that 50.6 % of the defense companies experienced immediate effects following the Crimean Peninsula's annexation. Among all headquarters, the reaction of companies from Europe, the US, and South Korea in 2014 was noteworthy. Subsequently, during the COVID-19 pandemic, 30.6 % of companies recorded movements with a medium frequency, revealing negative and moderate influence. Furthermore, the Russia-Ukraine war impacted the stocks of 81.4 % of the defense companies in our sample. The results clearly demonstrate the defense industry's global growth trend, particularly after 2014. Additionally, the conflict between Israel and Hamas that began in October 2023 has had a local effect on the Israeli defense industry without contributing to the spread of GPR. The study concludes that investors and decision makers must shift orientation toward knowledge of defense industry stocks to hedge and diversify the risks induced by GPR.

Indexed as

Crimean Peninsula annexationDefense industryGPRIsraeli–Hamas conflictRussia–Ukraine war

Identifiers

PMID39759327
PMCPMC11700249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.