ArticleHeliyon2024
Prognostic model based on M2 macrophage-related signatures for predicting outcomes, enhancing risk stratification, and providing therapeutic insights in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A palmitoylation-related signature predicts prognosis and immune microenvironment features in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- A predictive model based on immune related genes for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL).Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Tumor Microenvironment, Inflammation, and Inflammatory Prognostic Indices in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Analyze the Diversity and Function of Immune Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment From the Perspective of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Single-cell RNA sequencing in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: tumor heterogeneity, microenvironment, resistance, and prognostic markers.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The tumor microenvironment (TME) in lymphoma is influenced by M2 macrophages. This research proposes an novel predictive model that leverages M2 macrophage-associated genes to categorize risk, forecast outcomes, and evaluate the immune profile in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) undergoing R-CHOP therapy. Methods: Gene expression data and clinical information from DLBCL patients were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. Co-expressed genes linked to M2 macrophage in DLBCL were analyzed using CIBERSORT. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were conducted to explore associated signaling pathways. The M2 macrophage-related gene prognostic model was developed and validated using Cox and LASSO regression. Prognostic signature genes were verified by single-cell RNA-seq analysis. Results: 92 M2 macrophage-related genes were identified based on bulk-seq data. MS4A4A, CCL13, LTB, CCL23, CCL18, XKR4, IL22RA2, and FOLR2 were used to construct the risk model. AUC values for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival were 0.74, 0.72, and 0.72, respectively. High-risk patients demonstrated elevated immune scores and poorer overall survival. The high-risk subgroup also exhibited greater sensitivity to both chemotherapeutic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Conclusion: This study presents an accurate and reliable M2 macrophage-related risk model, enhancing understanding of distinct prognostic subsets in DLBCL. It offers potential novel drug options for future treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.