Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759276›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Studying extreme events: An interdisciplinary review of recent research.

J Alvre, L H Broska, D T G Rübbelke, S Vögele

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J AlvreTU Bergakademie Freiberg, Schloßplatz 1, 09599, Freiberg, Germany.
L H BroskaTU Bergakademie Freiberg, Schloßplatz 1, 09599, Freiberg, Germany.
D T G RübbelkeTU Bergakademie Freiberg, Schloßplatz 1, 09599, Freiberg, Germany.
S VögeleForschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Climate and Energy Systems - Jülich Systems Analysis, 52425, Jülich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While extreme events have been a focus of research for several decades, often centered around the causes and impacts of meteorological and climatological events, the term has expanded into a range of other disciplines, exploring a wide variety of associated topics. Analytical tools and definitions have hereby posed a challenge that has been addressed in different ways. Drawing from a broad body of research on extreme events, this review takes into account the often complex and cascading nature of extreme events in order to provide a large-scale overview of the main themes, discussions and trends of extreme event research. It does so by combining a systematic, large-scale analysis of publications on extreme events from 2019 to 2023 with additional database information on extreme events in the first part and a more in-depth narrative review on the main issues in the second part. The results show that extreme event research is dominated by meteorological and climatological extreme events and publications in the physical and life sciences. Identified focal areas in current research activities on extreme events are discussed in regards to issues of definitions and mathematical comprehension, extreme events and their impact in nature, and the interrelation of extremes and humans, including impacts on humans, extremes in human cognition, and human behaviors as causes and responses to extreme events.

Identifiers

PMID39759276
PMCPMC11699246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.