ArticleGenes & diseases2025
The effect of long-term administration of green tea catechins on aging-related cardiac diastolic dysfunction and decline of troponin I.
Article in Genes & diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Bone-Brain Axis Modulation and Tea Consumption for Enhancing Neurovascular Resilience and Patient Rehabilitation Education.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Green Tea Mitigates the Hallmarks of Aging and Age-Related Multisystem Deterioration.Aging and disease · 2025Review
- Impact of plant-derived antioxidants on heart aging: a mechanistic outlook.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Post-translational modifications orchestrate mTOR-driven cell death in cardiovascular disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Mechanisms of sorafenib-induced cardiotoxicity: ER stress induces upregulation of ATF3, leading to downregulation of NDUFS1 expression and mitochondrial dysfunction.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aging is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Cardiac diastolic dysfunction (CDD), ultimately leading to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), is prevalent among older individuals. Although therapeutics have made great progress, preventive strategies remain unmet medical needs. Green tea catechins have been shown to be effective in improving aging-related cardiovascular and cerebral disorders in animal models and patients. However, little attention has been paid to whether long-term administration of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), the major bioactive ingredient of green tea catechins, could prevent the onset and progression of CDD. In this study, 12-month-old female mice were orally administered 50, 100 and 200 mg EGCG mixed with drinking water for 6 months. Aged mice (18 months old) exhibited the major features of HFpEF, including CDD with pEF, cardiac fibrosis, increased cardiomyocyte apoptosis, and mitochondrial damages, as well as elevated A/B-type natriuretic peptide. Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) expression was also reduced. Long-term administration of 100 or 200 mg EGCG prevented aging-related CDD and exercise capacity decline, along with alleviating myocardial apoptosis and mitochondria damage. The transcription and protein expression of cTnI were increased, which might be achieved by inhibiting the expression and activity of histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), and reducing its binding level near cTnI's promoter, thereby elevating acetylated histone 3 (AcH3) and acetylated lysine 9 on histone H3 (AcH3K9) in the aged mice. We provide a novel insight that long-term administration of EGCG is a potentially effective strategy in preventing aging-related CDD and cTnI expression decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.