Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759093›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Evaluating the efficacy of hinged elbow braces in reducing passive valgus forces after ulnar collateral ligament injury-A biomechanical study.

Kai Hoffeld, Christopher Wahlers, Jan P Hockmann, Sebastian Wegmann, Nadine Ott, Kilian Wegmann, Lars Peter Müller, Michael Hackl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kai HoffeldDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne University of Cologne Cologne Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0742-0791
Christopher WahlersDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne University of Cologne Cologne Germany.
Jan P HockmannDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne University of Cologne Cologne Germany.
Sebastian WegmannDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne University of Cologne Cologne Germany.
Nadine OttDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne University of Cologne Cologne Germany.
Kilian WegmannOrthopädische Chirurgie München Munic Germany.
Lars Peter MüllerDepartment of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne University of Cologne Cologne Germany.
Michael HacklDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim University of Heidelberg Mannheim Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This biomechanical study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a hinged elbow orthosis in reducing passive valgus forces following medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries of the elbow joint. The hypothesis tested was that a hinged elbow orthosis reduces these passive valgus forces. Methods: Eight fresh frozen cadaveric elbow specimens were prepared and tested under three scenarios: intact ligaments, simulated UCL rupture and application of a hinged elbow brace after simulated UCL rupture. Valgus instability was assessed using a custom testing set-up and the Optotrak motion capture system. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare the results across scenarios. Results: Intraclass correlation (ICC) calculation showed that the testing set-up was reliable in investigating valgus deflection across all levels of applied force. The hinged elbow brace reduced passive valgus forces after UCL rupture. The reduction in valgus instability was consistent with close approximation to the native state, although not reaching its level. Conclusion: The hypothesis-that a hinged elbow orthosis significantly reduces passive valgus forces in the elbow following UCL injuries-is not supported by the data and therefore has to be rejected. Nevertheless, the study demonstrates a tendency that a hinged elbow brace could mitigate these forces, at least in an experimental cadaveric model with static study conditions. Level of Evidence: The level of evidence of this study is level IV.

Indexed as

elbow braceelbow orthosisUCL injuryUCL rupturevalgus instability

Identifiers

PMID39759093
PMCPMC11696245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.