ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024
Understanding the Complexity of Hypertension with Sarcopenia by Scientometric Analysis.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The scientometric analysis was aim to focus on recent studies and clarify new research directions on hypertension with sarcopenia. We hope to provide comprehensive insights or actionable recommendations for clinicians or policymakers. Methods: The Web of Science Core Collection database (WoSCC) from 2004 to 2023 for analysis was used. And VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and Origin software were utilized for scientometric analyses. Results: The United States was the primary contributor to 1,994 studies on hypertension with sarcopenia. The University of São Paulo emerged as the most prolific institution, with Morrell Nicholas W. being the most influential scholar and Cruz-Jentoft A.J. being the most co-cited author. PLoS One was the most prolific journal, whereas Circulation was the most relevant journal. Research has focused not only on physiological, biochemical, and cell biological mechanisms but also on sarcopenia associated with other diseases and involved in various fields, highlighting the complexity of the area and the need for integrative treatment. Keyword analysis revealed that, in addition to hypertension and sarcopenia, other topics such as obesity, pulmonary hypertension, old age, metabolic syndrome, inflammation, hypoxia, exercise, insulin resistance, and revascularization attracted attention. In recent years, COVID-19, mitochondria, handgrip strength, etc. have been hot topics, but aging, skeletal muscle, weight loss, diabetes, obesity, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, heart failure, mitochondria, mortality, exercise, and physical activity seems to bridge hypertension and sarcopenia research. Conclusion: This study highlights the distribution of fields, the structure of knowledge and the evolution of major research topics related to hypertension in patients with sarcopenia. Identifying keyword hotspots enhanced the comprehension of occurrence, development, and future research trends related to the topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.