ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Role of ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block for post-operative analgesia in pilonidal sinus surgery: A randomised trial.
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fascial plane blocks in labor: promise or illusion? A narrative review with expert opinion.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
- The Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Narrative Review.Pain and therapy · 2026Review
- Reflection on the sacral erector spinae plane block meta-analysis: When the name and the numbers don't tell the whole story.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-guided sacral multifidus plane block for perioperative analgesia: A comprehensive systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Efficacy of ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae block in elective surgery. An up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Publications by Indian authors on erector spinae plane block: A bibliometric analysis.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Review
- Comparison of Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Ring Block for Postoperative Analgesia Management Following Circumcision Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Pilonidal sinus surgery (PSS) can be done with local anaesthetic infiltration, spinal anaesthesia, or general anaesthesia (GA). Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is used for peri-operative analgesia. Erector spinae muscles extend to the sacral region, so it can provide post-operative analgesia in PSS. We evaluate the post-operative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided sacral ESPB, a novel technique, in patients undergoing PSS under GA. Material and Methods: Seventy patients aged 20-60 years, ASA class I and II, and scheduled for PSS under GA were included. Patients were randomly assigned to group I (control group), who received GA only, and in group II (SESPB group), sacral ESPB was performed after induction of GA. The primary outcome was post-operative pain evaluated by visual analogue score (VAS) at arrival to the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU), 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours post-operative. The secondary outcomes were time to first analgesic request post-operative, intra-operative fentanyl consumption, and complications. Results: There were significantly higher VAS scores in group I compared to group II at arrival to PACU, 1, 2, 8, and 24 hours post-operative ( Conclusion: Sacral ESPB could provide an effective post-operative analgesia for PSS with no reported complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.