ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Comparison of discussion-based and simulation-based learning methods using the Gas Man
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Inhalation anesthetics is basic knowledge that must be mastered by an anesthesiologist. Lack of competencies can result in higher morbidity and mortality in anesthesiology practice. Various learning methods were developed to improve understanding and retention. With the advancement of technology, the utilization of screen-based simulation (SBS) using applications is common, such as the Gas Man Material and Methods: This study is a randomized controlled trial involving anesthesiology and intensive care residents from the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia (FKUI) 2022-2023. The participants were randomized into two groups (simulation and discussion groups). A senior attending anesthesiologist led the discussion. The participants answered a pretest, followed by a 1-hour lecture about inhalation gas. Lastly, participants answered a posttest and filled in the satisfaction survey. Statistical analyses used the Mann-Whitney test to compare the two groups. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the knowledge improvement between the two groups. Results: Thirty-eight residents underwent simulation-based (n = 19) and discussion-based (n = 19) learning methods. The simulation group demonstrated a median (interquartile range) posttest score of 80 (76.67-83.33) compared with the discussion group with a score of 50 (40-66.67) ( Conclusion: The simulation-based learning method using the Gas Man
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.