Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39759047›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Prevalence of use of nonpharmacological methods of pain relief among patients following onco surgeries - A prospective, observational cohort study from a single center.

Sumitra G Bakshi, K Arya, Badal Dhurwe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sumitra G BakshiDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
K AryaDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Badal DhurweDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: For the aggressive treatment of postoperative pain, nonpharmacological methods (NPMs) are gaining importance complementary to routine multimodal pain management. The primary aim of the study was to assess the incidence of use of NPMs in our hospital. Secondary objectives were to correlate the pain scores, patient satisfaction, and percentage of time the patient was in severe pain within 72 h postsurgery with the use of NPMs when in pain/not in pain. The effect of NPMs on the physical and emotional outcome of patients as per the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ) was also assessed. Material and Methods: After obtaining approval from the institutional ethics committee (IEC), the trial was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI). Informed consent was obtained from adult patients on the third postoperative day of elective surgeries. Their responses to the APS-POQ and to a few additional questions about their beliefs on the use of NPM were recorded. Results: Only one-fourth of the total study population were using NPMs for pain management in the hospital. After propensity matching for surgery and postoperative analgesia, two groups were made: one using NPM for pain relief ( Conclusion: NPMs are rarely practiced and used during postoperative pain in our hospital. No difference in pain scores, patient satisfaction, and emotional and physical outcomes of the APS-POQ was seen in the group that indulged in NPMs.

Indexed as

Nonpharmacological methods of pain reliefpain acutepostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID39759047
PMCPMC11694864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.