Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758982›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Context familiarity is a third kind of episodic memory distinct from item familiarity and recollection.

Richard J Addante, Evan Clise, Randall Waechter, Jesse Bengson, Daniel L Drane, Jahdiel Perez-Caban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Richard J AddanteFlorida Institute of Technology, Department of Psychology, 150 W. University Dr., Melbourne, FL 32905, USA.
Evan CliseFlorida Institute of Technology, Department of Psychology, 150 W. University Dr., Melbourne, FL 32905, USA.
Randall WaechterWindward Islands Research and Education Foundation (WINDREF), Saint George University Medical School, Saint George, Grenada.
Jesse BengsonUniversity of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Daniel L DraneEmory University, School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jahdiel Perez-CabanFlorida Institute of Technology, Department of Psychology, 150 W. University Dr., Melbourne, FL 32905, USA.

Funding

Multimodal imaging of memory in epilepsy from whole brain networks to local neuronal responses: Implications for surgical decision-makingR01NS124585 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MCDONALD, CARRIE R · 2022 to 2025
$3.3M
NINDS NIH HHS L30 NS112849NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS124585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Episodic memory is accounted for with two processes: "familiarity" when generally recognizing an item and "recollection" when retrieving the full contextual details bound with the item. We tested a combination of item recognition confidence and source memory, focusing upon three conditions: "item-only hits with source unknown" ('item familiarity'), "low-confidence hits with correct source memory" ('context familiarity'), and "high-confidence hits with correct source memory" ('recollection'). Behaviorally, context familiarity was slower than the others during item recognition, but faster during source memory. Electrophysiologically, a triple dissociation was evident in event-related potentials (ERPs), which was independently replicated. Context familiarity exhibited a negative effect from 800 to 1200 ms, differentiated from positive ERPs for item-familiarity (400-600 ms) and recollection (600-900 ms). These three conditions thus reflect mutually exclusive, fundamentally different processes of episodic memory, and we offer a new, tri-component model of memory. Context familiarity is a third distinct process of episodic memory.

Indexed as

NeuroscienceSensory neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID39758982
PMCPMC11699256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.