ArticleRSC advances2025
Multiplex one-step direct asymmetric PCR of blood and dual-labelled probe-mediated melting curve for genotyping of MTHFR and MTRR polymorphisms.
Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on direct PCR and its applications.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2026Review
- An Efficient Pharmacogenomic Assay for Psychotropic Drugs by Multiplex Fluorescence Melting Curve Analysis.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
- Design of a melting curve analysis (MCA) based on multiplex real-time PCR for detection of Aspergillus terreus and Aspergillus fumigatus in cereals and oilseeds samples.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Artificial base mismatches-mediated PCR (ABM-PCR) for detecting clinically relevant single-base mutations.Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate, rapid, and multiplex SNP analysis holds significant clinical value. However, the inevitable nucleic acid extraction, involving centrifugation, heating, and magnetic separation, is often time-consuming. In this study, direct blood PCR was combined with dual-labelled probe-mediated melting curves to identify SNPs corresponding to MTHFR (C677T, rs#1801133 and A1298C, rs#1801131) and MTRR (A66G, rs#1801394) in a single tube. Our results indicated that nucleic acid extraction does not enhance gDNA concentrations. The results of the gDNA and whole blood samples were perfectly aligned with each other. The maximum volume tolerance for whole blood is 10%. Our method demonstrated robustness to hemolysis and temperature variations. The turnaround time of the test is <100 min with great potential value in clinical settings. Furthermore, this approach eliminates the need for complex preprocessing steps, simplifies the workflow and reduces potential sources of error. The efficiency and accuracy of this method make it a promising tool for routine clinical diagnostics and personalized medical applications. Additionally, the method's reliability and speed are crucial for effective patient management. The ability to obtain results quickly and accurately supports timely treatment decisions, which can be critical in many clinical scenarios. As a result, this technique has the potential to be widely adopted in clinical laboratories due to its practicality and effectiveness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.