ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2024
Change management for services redesign in healthcare: a conceptual framework.
Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redesigning Mental Health Care: Core Principles for Integrating Systems, Technology and Clinical Workflows.Current psychiatry reports · 2026Review
- Self-Leadership Based on Caring in Primary Nursing: Developing and Validating a Conceptual Model Through a Delphi Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The introduction of process innovations in healthcare organizations faces challenges in knowledge sharing and incorporating best practices due to a strong professional autonomy, leading to resistance to change. The healthcare paradigm is shifting towards value-based organizations with a patient-centered approach, requiring multidisciplinary care. Change management is crucial, but current approaches are often limited. This study proposes a conceptual framework to support change management in healthcare services redesign. Methods: The proposed conceptual framework was developed applying Jabareen's multidimensional and multi-method approach. The methodology involved 8 steps consisting in literature review, thematic and content analyses, concepts deconstruction and aggregation, graphical design of the framework, external validation and revision. Results: The framework integrates 53 evidences from the literature, 3 macro areas of interest and 42 change management models applied to the healthcare context, through 244 implementation actions. Aggregation of concepts led to 15 macro topics applicable to all levels of change and composing the proposed framework. Interviews validated the framework, emphasizing the importance of people-focused approaches and addressing resistance to change. Moreover, steps most and less cited in the literature are highlighted and differences between developed countries and economies in transition or developing countries are explored. Conclusions: The article proposes a 15-step framework for change in healthcare services redesign. It integrates evidence from literature and change management models, emphasizing stakeholder involvement. A case study in South Africa highlights the importance of awareness, planning, communication, training, and continuous review. Further validation and adaptation are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.