ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Visual Performance Correlation with Corneal Aberrometric Profile and Pupil Size After Implantation of a Trifocal Hydrophobic IOL.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Outcomes of the First Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Literature Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Functional Intermediate Vision and Pupil-Dependent Optical Behavior After Implantation of a Segmented Refractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of a hydrophobic trifocal diffractive intraocular lens: a literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Visual and Refractive Outcomes of a Hydrophobic Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens in Eyes with Different Axial Lengths.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes obtained after cataract surgery involving the implantation of a trifocal hydrophobic intraocular lens (IOL) and to determine if pupil size and the corneal aberrometric profile correlate to visual acuity at different distances. Methods: 49 patients (98 eyes) underwent bilateral cataract surgery with the placement of FineVision HP IOLs for presbyopia and were assessed at 1- and 3- to 6-months post-surgery. Postoperatively, refraction, monocular and binocular uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) and the binocular defocus curve were measured. Pupil size and corneal aberrations (higher-order and low-order aberrations; HOA and LOA) were also measured using a Scheimpflug 3D camera. Results: Sphere, cylinder and spherical equivalent decreased significantly after surgery (p<0.05) and CDVA had improved significantly 1-month post-surgery (p=0.007). The sphere, cylinder, spherical equivalent and CDVA values remained stable at the 3- to 6-month follow-up (p>0.05). Binocular UDVA was 0 logMAR or better for 79.2% of patients and binocular UNVA was 0.1 logMAR or better for 91.7%. The binocular defocus curve showed average maximum visual acuity values at -0.07±0.06 logMAR, 0.01±0.06 logMAR, and 0.01±0.06 logMAR, for far, intermediate and near distances, respectively. Neither the UDVA nor UNVA values correlated with patient pupil diameter (UDVA: r=0.035, p=0.744; UNVA: r=-0.073, p=0.492). Neither the UDVA nor UNVA values correlated with patient HOA or LOA (UDVA versus HOA: r=0.016, p=0.872; UDVA versus LOA: r=0.032, p=0.759; UNVA versus HOA: r=0.056, p=0.582; UNVA versus LOA: r=0.059, p=0.568). Conclusion: This study shows that the FineVision HP IOL provides excellent refractive and visual outcomes at different distances. Pupil size does not correlate with UDVA and UNVA and quality of vision does not seem to correlate with the corneal aberrometric profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.