ArticleFood science and biotechnology2025
Physico-chemical and microbiological properties of water kefir produced from carob (
Article in Food science and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential Use of Hazelnut Beverage in Water Kefir Fermentation: Effects of Sugar Addition on Physicochemical, Microbiological, Rheological, Bioactive, Volatile, and Allergenic Properties.Journal of food science · 2026Article
- Fortification of Water Kefir with Gallic Acid: Physicochemical Effects and Antioxidant Capacity in an In Vitro Digestion Model.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, sugar-free (A) and sugar-added (B) formulations of carob sherbet were fermented with water kefir grains. After 48 h of fermentation, the pH and total soluble solid content level (TSS) of A and B decreased, while the titratable acidity (TA) value increased. At the end of fermentation, Ave B formulations were stored at 4 °C for 28 days. Fermented sherbets' 2,2'-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity decreased with storage. A had 75.3% DPPH radical scavenging activity on day 0th, whereas B had 77.0%. B had less total phenolic content (TPC) than fermented A on day 0. TPC values decreased significantly, notably on days 21st and 28th of storage. After fermentation, A had more gallic acid, hesperidin,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.