Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758716›Full record

ReviewFood science and biotechnology2025

Analytical approaches to flavor research and discovery: from sensory-guided techniques to flavoromics methods.

In Hee Cho, Devin G Peterson

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Investigation on volatile and non-volatile components ofFood science and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

In Hee ChoDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology, Wonkwang University, Iksan, 54538 Korea.
Devin G PetersonDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6090-8227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review examines analytical methodology for food flavor analysis. Traditionally, flavor chemistry research has relied on sensory-guided chromatography techniques to identify individual compounds responsible for aroma or taste activity. Among the over 12,000 volatile compounds identified in foods, hundreds have been linked to aroma characteristics, and many taste-active compounds have also been discovered. However analytical methods based on singular compound evaluation are not without limitation and can overlook drivers of flavor perception by ignoring potential stimuli (i.e. antagonists, modulators), interactions among stimuli, and sub-threshold activity. More recently, chemical profiling methods coupled with multivariate analysis, termed flavoromics, have led to advances in flavor research. Utilization of flavoromic methods provides additional opportunities to define chemical stimuli that influence flavor profiles and qualities of food, as well as their contributions to complex perceptions, such as consumer acceptance.

Indexed as

Chemical profiling methodsFlavor analysisFlavoromicsMultivariate statistical analysisSensory guided analysis

Identifiers

PMID39758716
PMCPMC11695657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.