Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758713›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2025

Transforming neonatal nursing in India: challenges, opportunities, and the way forward.

Geetanjali Kalyan, Poonam Joshi, Lumchio Levis Murry, Marsha Campbell-Yeo, Surya Kant Tiwari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Geetanjali KalyanNational Institute of Nursing Education, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Poonam JoshiCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalyani, West Bengal, India.
Lumchio Levis MurryCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Marsha Campbell-YeoSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Surya Kant TiwariCollege of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal care is essential for the well-being of newborns, particularly premature or critically ill patients. Despite advancements in medical technology and evidence-based practice, India faces significant challenges in neonatal nursing, including resource limitations, inconsistent training, and inadequate policy support. This paper examines the current state of neonatal nursing in India, highlighting disparities between urban and rural areas, and comparing them to global practices. It explores systemic issues affecting neonatal care, such as inadequate educational frameworks, a shortage of trained faculty, and insufficient clinical exposure. We outline a comprehensive approach to address these challenges, including the introduction of Neonatal Nurse Practitioner programs, enhancements in specialized training, promotion of evidence-based practices, and integration of technology. We also emphasize the need for stronger policy support and increased funding to improve the neonatal care infrastructure. By adopting these recommendations, India can make significant strides towards improving neonatal outcomes and aligning itself with global health targets.

Indexed as

IndiaInfantInfant mortalityNeonatal nursingNewbornNurse practitionersTechnology

Identifiers

PMID39758713
PMCPMC11699293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.