Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758573›Full record

ReviewJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2024

Age of Viability: Clarifying Prenatal Documentation and Definitions in India's Contemporary Medical Landscape.

Girija Wagh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Girija WaghBharati Vidyapeeth DTU Medical College, Pune, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0486-0214

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of foetal viability has evolved significantly and has been influenced by advancements in neonatal care and legal frameworks. This review explores the complexities of defining foetal viability in India's contemporary medical landscape, particularly in light of the recent extension of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act to 24 weeks. The article examines the confusion surrounding the classification of extreme preterm births, Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, and prenatal documentation during sonography. It addresses the challenges in distinguishing between preterm birth and abortion and proposes solutions to standardize definitions and practices.

Indexed as

Counselling ChallengesEthical ConsiderationsFoetal ViabilityGestational AgeLegal FrameworkMaternal MorbidityMedical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) ActNeonatal CarePrenatal DocumentationPreterm Birth

Identifiers

PMID39758573
PMCPMC11693630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.