Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758572›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2024

Optimizing Cesarean Section Rates in India: Insights, Challenges, and Evidence-Based Strategies from an Expert Committee Meeting.

Reema Mukherjee, Vikas Shukla, Kh Jitenkumar Singh, Tanica Lyngdoh, Bharati Kulkarni, Nomita Chandhiok

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reema MukherjeeDivision of Reproductive, Child Health & Nutrition (RCN), Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Vikas ShuklaDivision of Reproductive, Child Health & Nutrition (RCN), Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Kh Jitenkumar SinghNational Institute for Research in Digital Health and Data Science, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Tanica LyngdohDivision of Reproductive, Child Health & Nutrition (RCN), Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Bharati KulkarniDivision of Reproductive, Child Health & Nutrition (RCN), Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Nomita ChandhiokDivision of Reproductive, Child Health & Nutrition (RCN), Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Caesarean Section Rates (CSR)Evidence-based practicesHealthcare disparitiesMaternal healthcareNational Family Health Surveys (NFHS)

Identifiers

PMID39758572
PMCPMC11693623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.