ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2024
Fetal Ascites: Its Prenatal Management and Postnatal Outcome.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Isolated Transient Neonatal Ascites in a Preterm Infant Born to a Mother with Mirror Syndrome: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Genetic etiology and pregnancy outcomes of abnormal fluid accumulation in fetus: A retrospective cohort study.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To report a single tertiary center experience in the management of prenatally diagnosed cases of fetal ascites and their postnatal outcomes. Methods: Prenatally diagnosed fetal ascites cases were retrospectively analyzed from 2015 to 2022 using two-dimensional ultrasound with other investigations as required in a tertiary care center. Results: Of 126 fetuses with fetal ascites, 70 progressed to hydrops and hence were excluded from the study. Out of the 56 that formed the study group, the median gestational age at presentation was 27.2 weeks (range 15 + 5 to 36 + 4 weeks). A majority (76.8%, 43/56) of ascites had a secondary etiology (secondary ascites) that was identified antenatally (including twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), fetal growth restriction (FGR), fetal anemia, structural cause involving genitourinary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular system, pulmonary tract and multi-system anomalies), while 23.2% (13/56) were classified as idiopathic ascites where no cause could be determined prenatally. The overall survival rate was 77.4% (24/31) with 41.9% (13/31) needing intervention and 35.5% (11/31) showing spontaneous resolution. 63.6% (7/11) of idiopathic ascites cases had favorable outcomes compared to secondary ascites (17/41, 41.5%). Conclusion: Fetuses with idiopathic ascites with normal karyotype and negative infection screening demonstrated a higher tendency for spontaneous resolution with a favorable outcome than secondary ascites. However, parents should be informed of the possibility of unexpected rare syndromes/structural abnormalities that may be detected after birth. In cases with secondary ascites, postnatal outcomes could be improved post-intervention. Multidisciplinary team involvement is necessary for the appropriate management and successful outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.