ArticleKansas journal of medicine
Breast Biopsy Notification Preferences and Health Literacy.
Article in Kansas journal of medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Communication of breast biopsy results varies and does not always meet patient expectations. This study aimed to determine how patients previously diagnosed with breast cancer preferred to receive their biopsy results, including preferences for communication methods, the type of medical professional delivering the results, and wait time. Additionally, we evaluated how health literacy might affect these preferences. Methods: English-speaking female patients who had previously been diagnosed with breast cancer were surveyed at a breast surgery clinic in Wichita, Kansas. The survey included the Brief Health Literacy Screen (BHLS), questions on how they received their biopsy results, and their preferences for receiving results. Participants were classified as having adequate or inadequate literacy based on their BHLS responses and a scoring system from previous research. Results: The study included 101 participants. Overall, 64% preferred in-person communication, 40% preferred to hear from their primary care physician, 36% from their surgeon, and 56% wanted results within 24 hours. There was no statistically significant difference in preferences based on health literacy, including communication method (p = 0.44), type of medical professional (p = 0.56), and wait time (p = 0.38). Conclusions: Most participants preferred to receive biopsy results indicating a breast cancer diagnosis in-person, regardless of their health literacy. While it may be sufficient to call a patient with benign biopsy results, it is recommended to offer an in-person discussion for cancer diagnoses, respecting the patient's preference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.