ArticleHardwareX2025
Design and manufacture of a low-cost 3D-printed laboratory device to measure the hyperelastic properties of polymeric films with small form factor suitable for medical devices.
Article in HardwareX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyperelastic materials are extensively incorporated in medical implants and microelectromechanical systems due to their large, elastic, recoverable strains. However, their mechanical properties are sensitive to processing parameters that may lead to inconsistent characterization. Various test setups have been employed for characterizing hyperelastic materials; however, they are often costly. Recent advancements in additive manufacturing and open-source software/hardware suggest the possibility of simpler solutions in research settings for characterizing them; raising the question of whether one can characterize these materials with low-cost tools and tests that take advantage of soft and small form-factor samples. Here, the authors investigate the potential of an open-source, 3D-printed test system designed for characterizing such materials. This system is tailored for small form-factor samples (sub-mm thickness) and large elastic deformations, common in polymeric parts of minimally invasive implants. The authors developed parts using additive manufacturing for uniaxial and planar tension testing, with a low-cost image correlation method adapted for measuring large strains. Polydimethylsiloxane was chosen for demonstration of a two-parameter Mooney-Rivlin model, due to its documentation and use in biocompatible devices. The estimated Young's and shear moduli were repeatable and consistent with the literature. Curve-fitting was challenging and dependent on the optimization choices, when data points were limited, consistent with prior reports. However, with a large number of data points and ideal optimization error choice,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.