Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758512›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in radiology2024

Luc Lerch, Lukas S Huber, Amith Kamath, Alexander Pöllinger, Aurélie Pahud de Mortanges, Verena C Obmann, Florian Dammann, Walter Senn, Mauricio Reyes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luc Lerch *Medical Image Analysis Group, ARTORG Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Lukas S Huber *Cognition, Perception and Research Methods, Department of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Amith KamathMedical Image Analysis Group, ARTORG Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Alexander PöllingerDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Aurélie Pahud de MortangesMedical Image Analysis Group, ARTORG Centre for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Verena C ObmannDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Florian DammannDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional, and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Walter SennComputational Neuroscience Group, Department of Physiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Mauricio ReyesCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Successful performance of deep learning models for medical image analysis is highly dependent on the quality of the images being analysed. Factors like differences in imaging equipment and calibration, as well as patient-specific factors such as movements or biological variability (e.g., tissue density), lead to a large variability in the quality of obtained medical images. Consequently, robustness against the presence of noise is a crucial factor for the application of deep learning models in clinical contexts. Materials and methods: We evaluate the effect of various data augmentation strategies on the robustness of a ResNet-18 trained to classify breast ultrasound images and benchmark the performance against trained human radiologists. Additionally, we introduce Results: We find that while available data augmentation approaches substantially improve robustness compared to models trained without any data augmentation, radiologists outperform models on noisy images. Using DreamOn data augmentation, we obtain a substantial improvement in robustness in the high noise regime. Conclusions: We show that REM-dream-inspired conditional GAN-based data augmentation is a promising approach to improving deep learning model robustness against noise perturbations in medical imaging. Additionally, we highlight a gap in robustness between deep learning models and human experts, emphasizing the imperative for ongoing developments in AI to match human diagnostic expertise.

Indexed as

breast cancerconvolutional neural networkdeep learninggenerative adversarial networkrobustnessultrasound

Identifiers

PMID39758512
PMCPMC11696537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.