ArticleFrontiers in radiology2024
Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Successful performance of deep learning models for medical image analysis is highly dependent on the quality of the images being analysed. Factors like differences in imaging equipment and calibration, as well as patient-specific factors such as movements or biological variability (e.g., tissue density), lead to a large variability in the quality of obtained medical images. Consequently, robustness against the presence of noise is a crucial factor for the application of deep learning models in clinical contexts. Materials and methods: We evaluate the effect of various data augmentation strategies on the robustness of a ResNet-18 trained to classify breast ultrasound images and benchmark the performance against trained human radiologists. Additionally, we introduce Results: We find that while available data augmentation approaches substantially improve robustness compared to models trained without any data augmentation, radiologists outperform models on noisy images. Using DreamOn data augmentation, we obtain a substantial improvement in robustness in the high noise regime. Conclusions: We show that REM-dream-inspired conditional GAN-based data augmentation is a promising approach to improving deep learning model robustness against noise perturbations in medical imaging. Additionally, we highlight a gap in robustness between deep learning models and human experts, emphasizing the imperative for ongoing developments in AI to match human diagnostic expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.