Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758508›Full record

ArticleCerebral circulation - cognition and behavior2025

Effect of randomised blood pressure lowering treatment and intensive glucose control on dementia and cognitive decline according to baseline cognitive function and other subpopulations of individuals with type 2 diabetes: Results from the ADVANCE trial.

Katie Harris, Jessica Gong, Stephen MacMahon, Ying Xu, Sultana Shajahan, Stephen Harrap, Neil Poulter, Michel Marre, Pavel Hamet, Giuseppe Mancia and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00145925 (ADVANCE - Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00145925 phase3completednot on this map

ADVANCE - Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron - MR Controlled Evaluation

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe George InstituteRan2001 to 2008Enrolled11,140ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsPerindopril-indapamide, Gliclazide MR-based glucose lowering
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Katie HarrisThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Jessica GongDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
Stephen MacMahonThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ying XuThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sultana ShajahanThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Stephen HarrapDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
Neil PoulterSchool of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Michel MarreClinique Ambroise Paré, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France & Institut Necker-Enfants Malades, INSERM, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Pavel HametMontréal Diabetes Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Quebec, Montreal, Canada.
Giuseppe ManciaUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Craig AndersonThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Mark WoodwardThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
John ChalmersThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Accumulating evidence indicates that reducing high blood pressure (BP) prevents dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Furthermore, although diabetes is a risk factor for dementia and MCI, there is uncertainty of the effect of intensive glucose control on these endpoints. This study aimed to determine the effects of BP-lowering (vs placebo) and intensive glucose-lowering (vs standard control) treatments according to baseline cognition and other characteristics on dementia and cognitive decline (CD) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: The Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial involved 11,140 individuals with T2DM. The effects of BP-lowering and intensive glucose-lowering treatments were explored in subgroups of baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), categorised as cognitively normal (scores ≥28) and cognitive impairment (scores <28). The primary outcome was a composite of dementia/CD that accounted for the competing risk of death. Multinomial regression models, adjusted for common cardiovascular risk factors, were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of the effects of the treatments on dementia/CD. Homogeneity of effects by subgroups were evaluated using interaction terms in the models. A two-sided p value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. Results: BP-lowering treatment (vs. placebo) was associated with a lower odds of dementia/CD in participants with cognitive impairment (OR 0.76, 95 % CI (0.59-0.99)) but not in those cognitively normal (OR 1.05, 95 % CI (0.92-1.21); p for interaction 0.03). Those with a history of cardio-renal-metabolic syndrome did not experience a benefit of active BP lowering treatment compared with placebo on dementia/CD. There were no further subgroup effects of BP-lowering treatment. The effect of intensive glucose lowering (vs standard control) on the odds of dementia/CD did not vary by baseline cognition subgroup. However, it did vary by level of blood glucose at baseline (<7.9 mmol/L OR 1.12, 95 % CI (0.96-1.30) vs ≥ 7.9 mmol/L 0.87 (0.75-1.00); p for interaction 0.02) and duration of T2DM (<10 years OR 0.92 (0.81-1.05) vs ≥10 years 1.16 (0.97-1.38); p for interaction 0.04). Conclusions: This study suggests greater effects of BP-lowering treatment in those with early loss of cognitive function than in those cognitively normal. There were also differential effects of intensive glucose-lowering on dementia and CD according to levels of blood glucose and duration of diabetes in people with T2DM. Clinical trial registration: ADVANCE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: number NCT00145925.

Indexed as

Blood pressure lowering treatmentCognitive declineDementiaDiabetesIntensive glucose control

Identifiers

PMID39758508
PMCPMC11699603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.