Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758505›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2024

E-norms and AI in clinical neurophysiology.

Joe F Jabre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joe F JabreDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To describe the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to automate the e-norms method, a technique used to derive normative data from patient studies, mixed datasets that contain both normal and abnormal data. Multiple studies have shown that normal values collected with the e-norms method compare favorably with those collected from healthy volunteers using traditional methods. Methods: OpenAI's ChatGPT was used by the author to build a Python script to automate the e-norms method's plateau identification, the area of the e-norms curve where a variable's normal values lie. To date, e-norms plateau identification has been done visually using an Excel Macro developed for that purpose. Results: E-norms normal values derived from the visual e-norms plateau identification with the Excel Macro compared favorably with those derived from the OpenAI's Python script developed by the author to automate the e-norms plateau identification. Conclusions: OpenAI's ChatGPT Python scripts can be developed by users with little to no experience in programming to automate the collection of e-norms normal values. Significance: A Neurologist with no experience in programming, and a limited knowledge of statistics was able to develop this on his own without the help of any programmers or statisticians.

Indexed as

AIChatGPTEMG Nerve ConductionsE-normsNormal Values

Identifiers

PMID39758505
PMCPMC11696621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.