ArticleMedical science educator2024
Nutrition Module: Addressing the Nutrition Education Gap in Undergraduate Medical Curricula via a Novel Approach.
Article in Medical science educator, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the known importance of nutrition on health outcomes, most medical curricula do not dedicate sufficient time to nutrition topics. Many barriers prevent the successful integration of nutrition education into existing curricula. Methods: We created an online nutrition module to educate students about foundational nutritional topics. To assess the efficacy of the module and improve integration of knowledge, students were asked to take a pre-assessment and a post-assessment immediately before and after completion of the module. Two months after completion, students were asked to take a follow-up assessment to assess long-term retention of the information covered in the module. Results: A total of 15 medical students completed all the requirements of the nutrition module (including pre-, post-, and follow-up assessments). The mean percent correct on the pre-, post-, and follow-up assessments were 67.5%, 87.0%, and 83.5%, respectively. The absolute difference between the pre- and post-module scores was 3.8 points (19.0%, Discussion: Most medical students do not feel adequately prepared to counsel patients on nutrition. Development of an accessible, online nutrition module was effective in teaching medical students about nutritional topics and in retaining the information over time. Advantages of the module include flexibility for students to choose when to complete the learning, brief (< 1 h) concise material, and the ability for educators to quickly update the module content. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02114-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.