Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758477›Full record

ReviewMedical science educator2024

A Review of the Enablers and Barriers of Medical Student Participation in Research.

Chance Mayne, Hannah Bates, Devang Desai, Priya Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science educator, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Enhancing Medical Student Oncology Research Experiences Through a Comprehensive Cancer Center-Led Initiative.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chance MayneDepartment of General Medicine, Toowoomba Base Hospital, Toowoomba, QLD Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4898-2926
Hannah BatesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2101-4386
Devang DesaiDirector of Urology, Toowoomba Hospital, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1937-936X
Priya MartinOccupational Therapy, School of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350 Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2092-6551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although research is an integral component in medicine, student participation in research remains limited. This is a systematic review conducted using rapid review methods conforming to the WHO and Cochrane guidelines to synthesise evidence on the enablers and barriers of medical student participation in research. PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched, yielding 27 final studies. Most studies were single-centre studies, and all were cross-sectional. All were quantitative except for one mixed-methods study. Identified barriers and enablers were mapped onto the micro, meso, and macro frameworks. There are more perceived barriers than enablers of medical students' participation in research. The micro, meso, and macro frameworks provide a useful system to unpack and tackle the barriers. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02156-z.

Indexed as

BarriersEnablersExtracurricularMedical studentStudent research

Identifiers

PMID39758477
PMCPMC11699221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.