Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758475›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2024

Tips for Harnessing the Educational Potential of Tumor Boards for Medical Students.

Aaron Lawson McLean, Anna C Lawson McLean, Stefanie Hartinger, Jakob Hammersen, Robert Drescher, Salome Schuldt, Christian Senft, Matthias Mäurer, Marcel A Kamp, Irina Mäurer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aaron Lawson McLeanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5528-6905
Anna C Lawson McLeanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3146-4241
Stefanie HartingerDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Jakob HammersenDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Robert DrescherDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Salome SchuldtDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiooncology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Christian SenftDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.
Matthias MäurerDepartment of Radiation Therapy and Radiooncology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Marcel A KampCentre for Palliative and Neuropalliative Care, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Campus Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg, Germany.
Irina MäurerDepartment of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores the underutilized educational potential of tumor boards as a platform for medical student education. Acknowledging the complexity and multidisciplinary nature of tumor boards, we propose 12 strategic interventions aimed at integrating undergraduate medical students into these meetings to enhance their learning experience. These strategies emphasize active student engagement, critical analysis, patient interaction, reflective practice, and the integration of digital learning tools, with a focus on fostering an in-depth understanding of team-based, patient-focused oncology care. The approach advocates for the inclusion of medical students in tumor board discussions, not merely as observers but as active participants, thereby providing them with a unique, real-world learning environment. By doing so, the paper argues for the significant benefits of such involvement, including improved understanding of evidence-based practice, patient-centered care, ethical considerations, and the dynamics of interprofessional collaboration. This integrated educational model aims to prepare future physicians with the competencies necessary for effective participation in interdisciplinary healthcare teams, highlighting the importance of experiential learning in the context of oncology and beyond. The strategies outlined in this paper offer a roadmap for medical educators seeking to enhance the educational value of tumor boards and contribute to the development of a collaborative, informed, and empathetic oncology workforce.

Indexed as

Active learningCase-based learningDigital learning toolsInterprofessional educationMedical studentsOncologyReflective practiceTumor boards

Identifiers

PMID39758475
PMCPMC11699140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.