Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758472›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2024

Changes in the Affective Empathy of Osteopathic Students: a Longitudinal Study.

Bruce W Newton, Zachary T Vaskalis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bruce W NewtonDepartment of Anatomy, Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, NC USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9837-1541
Zachary T VaskalisDepartment of Medical Education, Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, NC USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Establishing an empathic bond of trust with patients is a characteristic that needs to be taught to medical students. Patients feel physicians are more caring if they sense their physician is empathetic. Yet, longitudinal studies have shown an erosion of affective empathy as allopathic medical students progress through their education. Although there are studies examining cognitive empathy among osteopathic students, there has not been a longitudinal study which has examined potential changes in affective empathy. Methods: During orientation to the Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine (M1 timepoint), and at the beginning of each subsequent academic year (M2-M4 timepoints), and just before graduation (M4F timepoint) the graduating classes of 2017-2019 were asked to voluntarily participate in a longitudinal study by filling out the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES), which measures affective empathy. Desired specialty choice and sex was also collected at each of the five timepoints. Specialty choice was divided into Core and Non-Core groups. Core specialties are "people-oriented" and have a large amount of patient contact and continuity of care and include Family and Internal Medicine, Ob/Gyn, Pediatrics and Psychiatry. Non-Core specialties are "technical- or procedure-oriented" and are those with little or no patient contact and/or continuity of care (e.g., Radiology, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Anesthesiology). Results: For men, BEES scores significantly dropped over the five timepoints ( Conclusion: The decline in affective empathy scores for osteopathic students has differences when compared to a similar longitudinal study of allopathic medical students.

Indexed as

Affective empathyBalanced emotional empathy scaleBEESMedical studentsOsteopathic medicine

Identifiers

PMID39758472
PMCPMC11699168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.