ArticleMedical science educator2024
Clinical Instructor Perceptions of Preparedness, Performance, and Professionalism of Doctor of Physical Therapy Students from a 2-Year Hybrid Program: A Mixed Methods Study.
Article in Medical science educator, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) education models vary in length, philosophy, and delivery. The purpose of this study was to explore clinical instructor (CI) perceptions of performance in DPT students from a 2-year hybrid program. Methods: In this mixed methods phenomenological study, data from eight cohorts of students were examined. Correlation analysis was used to examine the relationship between CI background (experience, degree, certification) and their perception of student preparedness for clinical experiences. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare CI perception of preparedness between CI groups. Subjects participated in semi-structured interviews and data were organized using inductive coding prior to analysis. Results: Analysis included 1711 records. The majority of CIs noted students were prepared for clinical experiences (96.3%) and were as prepared or more prepared than students from a 3-year on-site program (89.0%). There were no differences in CI perception based on CI background. Qualitative analysis from 22 interviews revealed four CI perception themes: preparedness, performance, professionalism, and clinical reasoning. Almost all CIs reported that students from a 2-year hybrid program were as strong or stronger than students from a 3-year residential/on-site program. If the CI had a negative performance expectation of the 2-year hybrid student before the rotation, almost all changed to a positive impression following rotation. Conclusions: CI perception is that students from a 2-year hybrid program are as strong or stronger than students from a 3-year residential/on-site program. Our findings suggest clinical preparedness, performance, and professionalism of 2-year hybrid DPT students meet or exceed CI expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.