ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2024
"Internet+" pharmacy in psychiatric hospital amid COVID-19 and post-pandemic period: analysis and development.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Analysis of Prescriptions and Pharmacy Services in Internet-Based Psychiatric Hospital During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- Integrated Internet-Based Pharmaceutical Care and Its Association with Clinical Outcomes and Medication Adherence in Older Adults with Multimorbidity: A Prospective Observational Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Five years after the pandemic: rethinking the pharmacological management of mental disorders.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to explore the differences in "Internet+" pharmacy prescriptions in psychiatric hospitals before and after the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. It also seeks to examine changes in patient healthcare behaviors in the post-pandemic era and to identify the potential role of "Internet+" pharmacy in improving the current healthcare system. Methods: Prescriptions from the "Internet+" pharmacy at The Affiliated Mental Health Center of Jiangnan University, collected between December 1, 2021, and November 30, 2023, were analyzed. The period was divided into four stages based on the COVID-19 pandemic's progression in China. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted on various prescription-related factors, including patient information, prescription type, disease distribution, medication type, frequency of medication use, pharmacist review time, and instances of irrational medication use. Results: A total of 2914 prescriptions were collected. The male-to-female ratio (MFR) varied significantly across different stages of the epidemic. In the pre-pandemic II period, females represented the highest proportion (66.10%, MFR 0.51), and individuals aged 18-39 made up the majority (56.70%) across all stages. The proportion of psycho-counseling prescriptions was highest in the pre-pandemic II period (76.74%), while the total number of psycho-counseling prescriptions was greatest during the epidemic, with 798 cases. A total of 38 diseases were involved, with depression accounting for the largest proportion (38.98%) at each stage, followed by the highest usage of antidepressants (49.60%). A total of 85 types of medications were used, with quetiapine representing the highest proportion before the epidemic (16.56%, 10.92%), while escitalopram accounted for the highest proportion after the epidemic (10.98%). The majority of patients (70.87%) took medication once daily. 42.23% of pharmacist review times were ≤1 minute, and the mean review time was longest in the post-pandemic period (6175.1 seconds). During the pre-pandemic and epidemic periods, the most common pharmacist review time occurred between 12:00 and 17:59 (41.46%), while in the post-pandemic period, the most common review time was between 18:00 and 23:59 (36.70%). The initial rate of irrational prescriptions was 37.85%. After manual review by pharmacists, the irrational prescription rate of Internet prescriptions decreased to 1.13%. Conclusion: The development of "Internet+" pharmacy has effectively addressed the medical needs of the relevant population and played a crucial role in combating the COVID-19 pandemic. Future advancements should focus on optimizing the allocation of healthcare resources and expanding innovative pharmacy services to broaden the developmental pathways of the 'Internet+' pharmacy ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.