ArticleMethodsX2025
Multifrequency electrical impedance tomography (Mf-EIT) for the detection of breast cancer phantom anomalies.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed neoplasm and one of the most widespread cancers among women. The research advanced the Mf-EIT hardware through analogue discovery, component assessment, hardware integration, software creation, and data reconstruction utilizing Gauss-Newton and GREIT approaches. The breast cancer phantom consisted of a gelatin and sodium chloride solution. The position and number of anomalies in the reconstructed image correspond with the phantom. Anomalies in the reconstructed image are illustrated in red, indicating that they exhibit higher conductivity than their environment. The smallest percentage difference in conductivity between the reconstructed image of the cancer abnormality and the phantom is 0.18 %, recorded at a current of 0.35 mA and a frequency of 150 kHz. The smallest percentage difference in size between cancer abnormalities 1 and 2 in the reconstructed image and the phantom is 0.14 %, observed at a current of 0.22 mA and a frequency of 80 kHz. In brief,•This study proposes an innovative Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT)•The designed and built the Mf-EIT hardware based on data reconstruction using Gauss-Newton and GREIT•The Electrical Impedance Tomography designed to detect the anomalies in the reconstructed image of Breast Cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.