Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758423›Full record

ArticleBiophysics reports2024

Current status of FAP-directed cancer theranostics: a bibliometric analysis.

Dan Ruan, Simin Wu, Xuehua Lin, Liang Zhao, Jiayu Cai, Weizhi Xu, Yizhen Pang, Qiang Xie, Xiaobo Qu, Haojun Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysics reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Bridging Research and Clinical Practice: Automated [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dan RuanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Development and Translation of Radiopharmaceuticals, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Simin WuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Development and Translation of Radiopharmaceuticals, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Xuehua LinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Development and Translation of Radiopharmaceuticals, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Liang ZhaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Development and Translation of Radiopharmaceuticals, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Jiayu CaiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Development and Translation of Radiopharmaceuticals, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Weizhi XuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Development and Translation of Radiopharmaceuticals, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Yizhen PangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Development and Translation of Radiopharmaceuticals, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Qiang XieDepartment of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Xiaobo QuNational Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Department of Electronic Science, Intelligent Medical Imaging R & D Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.
Haojun ChenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Development and Translation of Radiopharmaceuticals, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361102, Fujian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is a key molecule in the field of oncology, with significant impacts on tumor diagnosis and treatment. Importantly, it has paved the way for the development of radiotracers for quinoline-based FAP inhibitors (FAPIs), which are currently among the most promising radiotracers for PET imaging in cancer. We performed a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications related to FAP and FAPI-based radiotracers, which included the quantification and visualization of current research trends and prospects based on various bibliometric indicators. In our survey of FAP-related studies in the Web of Science Core Collection databases, R and VOSviewer were used for visualization and bibliometric analyses based on country, institute, author, journal, and keywords. We also examined the methodology, radionuclide type, imaging instruments, and major diseases associated with studies on FAPI-based radiotracers. The results revealed 2,664 FAP-related publications from 1992 to the present. Germany, the USA, and China dominated paper publications, multinational collaborations, and societal impacts on FAP research. Southwest Medical University was the most productive institute, while Haberkorn Uwe authored the most cited papers and the highest H-index. The

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysisCancerFAPIFibroblast activation proteinPET/CTRadionuclide

Identifiers

PMID39758423
PMCPMC11693499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.