ArticleHeliyon2025
Effect of different post-processing conditions on the accuracy of liquid crystal display-printed orthognathic surgical splints.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Build Platform Position on the Trueness and Precision of LCD 3D-Printed Orthognathic Surgical Splints.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Digitally planned bimaxillary orthognathic surgery with 3D-printed splints for skeletal class III malocclusion: A case series.Medicine · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensionally Printed Splints in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy (trueness and precision) of liquid crystal display (LCD)-printed orthognathic surgical splints under two different post-processing conditions-rinsing solvent and post-polymerization time. Materials and methods: An LCD 3D printer was used to create 48 surgical splints using the same reference standard tessellation language (STL) files. They were randomly assigned to two experimental studies. In the rinsing solvent study, 24 surgical splints were divided into three groups (n = 8) based on their rinsing solvents: isopropyl alcohol (IPA), ethanol, and water. In the post-polymerization time study, 24 surgical splints were divided into three groups (n = 8) based on the post-polymerization time: (3, 6, and 10 min). The surgical splints were covered with an opaque scanning spray, scanned, and converted into STL files. The images were trimmed and superimposed onto the reference STL file to evaluate trueness and precision, and the deviation was calculated using the root mean square (RMS) formula. Color map data were also obtained. The RMS was statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test (α < 0.05). Results: The lowest RMS values of trueness and precision were observed in the IPA group and the 6-min post-polymerization time groups (p < 0.05). The IPA-rinse and 6-min polymerization groups (p < 0.05) demonstrated the highest accuracy for LCD-printed orthognathic surgical splint fabrication. Conclusion: The dimensional accuracy of LCD-printed surgical splints is affected by the post-processing conditions, including the rinsing solvent and polymerization time. The RMS and color map data associated with the IPA-rinse and 6-min polymerization corresponded to the highest accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.