Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758397›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Digital technology administrative penalties and green technology innovation: Evidence from China.

Hong Li, Xiaohui Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hong LiSchool of Economics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, 611100, China.
Xiaohui ChenFaculty of Economics and Business Administration, Yibin University, Yibin, 644000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In digital economy era, digital technology is a key force to promote green technological innovation (GTI). Digital technology administrative penalties (DTAP) are an important means to regulate the development of digital technology enterprises, but its ability to effectively guide digital technology enterprises to better serve GTI remains to be further examined. DTAP sends signals to physical enterprises, financial enterprises, and individuals, thereby affecting the allocation of resources, such as technology, talent, and funds. Green technology innovation requires support from these resources, raising the question of how DTAP may affect GTI. This study proposes hypotheses based on signal theory and uses urban data from China from 2008 to 2020 to empirically test the impact of DTAP on GTI. The research findings indicate that DTAP is conducive to improving regional GTI, and DTAP facilitates GTI by fostering digital industrialization and financial technology development. The heterogeneity analysis reveals that the DTAP has a stronger promotion effect on the GTI in municipalities and low-carbon pilot cities. Our research is meaningful and can serve as a reference for other developing countries to standardize administrative supervision of the digital economy and promote the green economic transformation.

Indexed as

Digital industrializationDigital technology administrative penalties (DTAP)Financial technologyGreen technology innovation (GTI)Signal theory

Identifiers

PMID39758397
PMCPMC11699324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.