Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758372›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2025

Deep learning-based object detection algorithms in medical imaging: Systematic review.

Carina Albuquerque, Roberto Henriques, Mauro Castelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Wrist Joint Injury Diagnosis.International journal of medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  16. [Detection of neurofibroma combining radiomics and ensemble learning].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carina AlbuquerqueNOVA Information Management School, Lisboa, Portugal.
Roberto HenriquesNOVA Information Management School, Lisboa, Portugal.
Mauro CastelliNOVA Information Management School, Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, Deep Learning (DL) techniques have demonstrated remarkable advancements across various domains, driving their widespread adoption. Particularly in medical image analysis, DL received greater attention for tasks like image segmentation, object detection, and classification. This paper provides an overview of DL-based object recognition in medical images, exploring recent methods and emphasizing different imaging techniques and anatomical applications. Utilizing a meticulous quantitative and qualitative analysis following PRISMA guidelines, we examined publications based on citation rates to explore into the utilization of DL-based object detectors across imaging modalities and anatomical domains. Our findings reveal a consistent rise in the utilization of DL-based object detection models, indicating unexploited potential in medical image analysis. Predominantly within Medicine and Computer Science domains, research in this area is most active in the US, China, and Japan. Notably, DL-based object detection methods have gotten significant interest across diverse medical imaging modalities and anatomical domains. These methods have been applied to a range of techniques including CR scans, pathology images, and endoscopic imaging, showcasing their adaptability. Moreover, diverse anatomical applications, particularly in digital pathology and microscopy, have been explored. The analysis underscores the presence of varied datasets, often with significant discrepancies in size, with a notable percentage being labeled as private or internal, and with prospective studies in this field remaining scarce. Our review of existing trends in DL-based object detection in medical images offers insights for future research directions. The continuous evolution of DL algorithms highlighted in the literature underscores the dynamic nature of this field, emphasizing the need for ongoing research and fitted optimization for specific applications.

Indexed as

Bibliometric analysisDeep learningMedical imagingObject detectionQualitative analysisQuantitative analysis

Identifiers

PMID39758372
PMCPMC11699422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.