ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
Composite dietary antioxidant index in relation to urge urinary incontinence in US men.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Ketogenic Diet and Overactive Bladder: The Mediating Roles of Dietary Inflammatory Index and Weight-Adjusted Waist Index.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Positive relationship between an aggregate index of systemic inflammation and stress urinary incontinence: a nationwide cross-sectional analysis.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- The association of exogenous dietary antioxidant micronutrient intake and consumption timing with urinary albumin excretion among U.S. adults.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Commentary: Association between composite dietary antioxidant index and increased urinary albumin excretion: a population-based study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Urinary incontinence (UI), particularly urge urinary incontinence (UUI), is a prevalent condition that worsens with age and negatively affects quality of life. Antioxidants, measured by the composite dietary antioxidant index (CDAI), have been linked to inflammation and other diseases, but their relationship with UUI remains uncertain. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between UUI prevalence and CDAI. Materials and methods: Data for this cross-sectional study were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey's four cycles (2011-2018). The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the relationship between CDAI and male UUI were ascertained by the use of weighted univariate analysis, multivariate logistic regression, restricted cubic spline regression, and subgroup analysis. PSM and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Results: A total of 7,735 participants took part in this study. After adjusting for potential confounders, CDAI was found to be negatively associated with the prevalence of UUI in those with lower CDAI (about half overall). This relationship lost significance in populations with higher CDAI. The negative correlation between zinc and the prevalence of UUI was more significant in populations with low antioxidant diets. The results remained consistent, with subgroup analyses finding a significant interaction effect for race only after PSM ( Conclusion: This study showed a negative correlation between CDAI and UUI incidence in the group of men with low CDAI levels (about half of the population). Thus, effective prevention or treatment of UUI requires dietary changes aimed at the male population with poor antioxidant diets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.