ReviewDigital health
Artificial intelligence in precision medicine for lung cancer: A bibliometric analysis.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge structure and paradigm evolution in anal fistula diagnosis and treatment: a bibliometric analysis based on PubMed.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Lung Cancer: Advances in Imaging, Detection, and Prognosis.Cancers · 2025Review
- Unraveling the molecular-pathological characteristics and cellular complexity of the tumor immune microenvironment in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in primary health care: A bibliometric analysis of publications from 2015 to 2024.Digital healthReview
- Mapping knowledge landscapes and emerging trends in artificial intelligence in glioblastoma: A bibliometric analysis.Digital healthArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The increasing body of evidence has been stimulating the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in precision medicine research for lung cancer. This trend necessitates a comprehensive overview of the growing number of publications to facilitate researchers' understanding of this field. Method: The bibliometric data for the current analysis was extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection database, CiteSpace, VOSviewer ,and an online website were applied to the analysis. Results: After the data were filtered, this search yielded 4062 manuscripts. And 92.27% of the papers were published from 2014 onwards. The main contributing countries were China, the United States, India, Japan, and Korea. These publications were mainly published in the following scientific disciplines, including Radiology Nuclear Medicine, Medical Imaging, Oncology, and Computer Science Notably, Li Weimin and Aerts Hugo J. W. L. stand out as leading authorities in this domain. In the keyword co-occurrence and co-citation cluster analysis of the publication, the knowledge base was divided into four clusters that are more easily understood, including screening, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Conclusion: This bibliometric study reveals deep learning frameworks and AI-based radiomics are receiving attention. High-quality and standardized data have the potential to revolutionize lung cancer screening and diagnosis in the era of precision medicine. However, the importance of high-quality clinical datasets, the development of new and combined AI models, and their consistent assessment for advancing research on AI applications in lung cancer are highlighted before current research can be effectively applied in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.