ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Prostate Cancer Patient With Lymph-node Metastasis Treated Only With Methionine Restriction Has Stable Disease for Two Years Demonstrated With PET/CT and PSMA-PET Scanning and PSA Testing.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thirty Years of Mentoring by "Bob Chan" of Young Japanese Surgeons to Become Scientists: An Adventure of Love.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Review
- Dietary impacts on prostate cancer immunotherapy.Immunotherapy · 2025Review
- Engineered Methioninase-expressing Tumor-targetingCancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
- HT1080 Fibrosarcoma With Acquired Trabectedin Resistance: Increased Malignancy But Sustained Sensitivity to Methionine Restriction.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
- Eradication of Extensive Lymph-Node, Bone and Pleural Metastases of a Breast-Cancer Patient Treated With Radiation, Immunotherapy and Oral Recombinant Methioninase.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: Metastatic prostate cancer is a recalcitrant disease. Our laboratory has previously treated prostate-cancer patients with methionine restriction effected by a low methionine diet and oral recombinant methioninase (o-rMETase), both alone and in combination with other agents. The present case is a 66-year-old patient who had a radical prostatectomy in 2019 with a Gleason score 3+3 and 3+4. The patient subsequently was treated with immunotherapy in 2021 and salvage proton-beam therapy in 2022, and subsequently treated only with o-rMETase and a low-methionine diet. The aim of the present study was to determine the long-term efficacy of methionine restriction on the patient's prostate cancer. Case Report: Starting in September 2022, the patient started methionine restriction with a low methionine-diet and o-rMETase, twice a day, after meals, at 250 units/dose. Since the start of methionine restriction, the patients' prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has remained stable, under 2 ng/ml. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET imaging indicated in September 2023 a right pelvic-side-wall metastatic lymph node that was stable when the PSMA-PET scan was repeated in March 2024, with the standardized uptake value (SUV) decreasing from 19.39 to 14.98. A very small possible metastatic external-iliac lymph node was detected in March 2024. Thus, the lymph-node metastases were stable and did not increase. Conclusion: During the time the patient was on methionine restriction alone, effected by a low-methionine diet and o-rMETase, the metastatic prostate cancer did not progress. Further clinical studies of methionine restriction and metastatic prostate cancer are needed, including randomized clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.