ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Treatment Strategies in Elderly Patients With Operable, Hormone Receptor-negative Breast Cancer.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aim: Elderly patients with early-stage breast cancer have potentially been underrepresented in clinical trials. Thus, treatment strategies for a minority of elderly patients with hormone receptor (HR)-negative breast cancer may be inadequately informed. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 126 patients with HR-negative breast cancer aged ≥65 years. Patients aged ≥75 years (group A) were compared with those aged 65-74 years (group B). Of the 126 surgically treated patients, 48 were in group A and 78 were in group B. Results: The number of patients who did not undergo axillary lymph node surgery was significantly higher in group A than that in group B (15% vs. 2%, respectively, p=0.047). The number of patients who received radiotherapy was significantly lower in group A than B (13% vs. 44%, respectively, p<0.01). The number of patients who did not receive chemotherapy was significantly higher in group A than B (79% vs. 23%, respectively, p<0.01). Breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival showed no significant difference between groups. Conclusion: Omission of axillary surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy may not have a significant prognostic impact in patients with HR-negative breast cancer aged ≥75 years. Multiple age-related factors complicate the standardization of optimal treatment decisions for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.