ArticleJPRAS open2025
Extensive scalp soft-tissue reconstruction with free flaps: A simplified therapeutic algorithm for donor site selection based on a retrospective analysis.
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative technique to cover exposed dura mater after occipital osteomyelitis, using our triple layer using matriderm. A case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Salvage reconstruction of an irradiated and infected scalp-calvarial defect following recurrent atypical meningioma: recipient-vessel strategy and multidisciplinary decision-making.Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Extensive scalp defects present a significant reconstructive challenge due to the complex needs of patients that are often beyond the scope of conventional therapies, which makes free flaps the most reliable solution. Despite the variety of free flaps available for such cases, there is a lack of clear criteria for selecting the most suitable option. The primary objective of this study was to provide a simplified guide for the selection of donor sites for free flaps for achieving optimal reconstruction outcomes. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 15 patients who underwent scalp reconstruction with free flaps between 2017 and 2022: 4 latissimus dorsi (LD), 4 omental (OM), 5 anterolateral thigh (ALT), and 2 radial forearm free (RFF) flaps. Reconstructive and postoperative data for all patients were collected, evaluated, and compared. Results: The mean defect size to be restored was 110.60 ± 14.55 cm² (LD 162.23 ± 23.1 cm Conclusion: Reconstructing extensive scalp defects requires careful consideration of critical factors such as defect size, donor tissue availability, need for adjuvant therapies, and patient comorbidities when selecting a flap. This underscores the importance of tailored approaches to enhance clinical outcomes. We propose a simplified algorithm for free flap selection to streamline the decision-making process in complex cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.