ReviewFrontiers in public health2024
Scale-based screening and assessment of age-related frailty.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic value of sarcopenia in aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- The Application of Metabolomics in Frailty: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions.Metabolites · 2026Review
- A survey of community pharmacists' perceptions, attitudes, and practices regarding support for physical activity, exercise, and frailty.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Interpretable Machine Learning for Frailty Screening in Older Adults Using Routine Clinical Variables with and Without SARC-F: A Pilot Diagnostic Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrated Internet-Based Pharmaceutical Care and Its Association with Clinical Outcomes and Medication Adherence in Older Adults with Multimorbidity: A Prospective Observational Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Identifying Frailty Risk in Older Adults: The Predictive Value of Functional Tests and Center-of-Pressure-Based Postural Metrics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the population ages, the prevalence of age-related frailty increases sharply, which increases the risk of poor health status of older adults, such as disability, falls, hospitalization, and death. Across the globe, frailty is moving toward the forefront of health and medical research. Currently, frailty is believed to be preventable and reversible, so the early identification of frailty is critical. However, there are neither precise biomarkers of frailty nor definitive laboratory tests and corresponding clinical testing techniques and equipment in clinical practice. As a result, the clinical identification of frailty is mainly achieved through the widely used frailty scale, which is an objective, simple, time-saving, effective, economical, and feasible measurement tool. In this narrative review, we summarized and analyzed the various existing frailty scales from different perspectives of screening and evaluation, aiming to provide a reference for clinical researchers and practitioners to judge and manage frail older people accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.