ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Leveraging new methodologies for public health crisis management.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Canadian adaptive platform trial of treatments for COVID in community settings (CanTreatCOVID): recruitment strategies of a decentralized, national randomized controlled trial for acute SARS-CoV-2.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- Mapping the Public Health Landscape in Greece: Governance, Stakeholders, Data Systems, and Policy Frameworks.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
- Trends in Emergency Department utilization by disease categories in a migrant-dense high-income setting: a retrospective study in Dubai, 2021-2025.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Human resource development in public health emergency management: a scoping review.BMJ public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence-based medicine is critical in public health emergencies, offering a framework for decision-making and adaptive healthcare responses. By relying on up-to-date and reliable evidence, EBM enables healthcare systems to respond quickly to evolving crises and ensures efficient resource allocation. This perspective presents the importance of evidence-based medicine in public health emergencies, emphasizing the need for rapid decision-making and preparedness. It identifies challenges from the COVID-19 pandemic, including barriers to evidence synthesis, and explores innovative solutions, including methodological pluralism and systems thinking. The findings highlight that evidence-based medicine improves health care systems' responsiveness to public health crises, supports the efficient resource allocation, and reinforces the need for flexible strategies that adapt to rapidly evolving information. In particular, the practical implications underscore that, in crisis settings, EBM must expand beyond strict evidence hierarchies to include timely, reasonable, and sometimes intuitive expert judgments, ensuring robust and adaptable responses. In conclusion, while EBM enhances healthcare adaptability and decision-making in emergencies, future responses will benefit from incorporating more diverse and flexible approaches to ensure more resilient and effective public health strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.