ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Automated approach for fetal and maternal health management using light gradient boosting model with SHAP explainable AI.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fetal health classification: a deep learning model with enhanced interpretability and lightweight deployment.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based fetal health prediction and development of smart web application.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in neurocardiology: decoding brain-heart network interactions for clinical and translational insights.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- A Model of the First Trimester Evaluation of Foetal Movements and Their Outcomes via Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Multicentric Study.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fetal health holds paramount importance in prenatal care and obstetrics, as it directly impacts the wellbeing of mother and fetus. Monitoring fetal health through pregnancy is crucial for identifying and addressing potential risks and complications that may arise. Early detection of abnormalities and deviations in fetal health can facilitate timely interventions to mitigate risks and improve outcomes for the mother and fetus. Monitoring fetal health also provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of prenatal interventions and treatments. For fetal health classification, this research work makes use of cardiotocography (CTG) data containing 21 features including fetal growth, development, and physiological parameters such as heart rate and movement patterns with three target classes "normal," "suspect," and "pathological." The proposed methodology makes use of data upsampled using the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) to handle the class imbalance problem that is very crucial in medical diagnosing with a light gradient boosting machine. The results show that the proposed model gives 0.9989 accuracy, 0.9988 area under the curve, 0.9832 recall, 0.9834 precision, 0.9832 F1 score, 0.9748 Kappa score, and 0.9749 Matthews correlation coefficient value on the test dataset. The performance of the proposed model is compared with other machine learning models to show the dominance of the proposed model. The proposed model's significance is further evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation and comparing the proposed model with other state-of-the-art models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.