ArticleBiology of sport2025
Dose-response and time-lagged effect of daily training load on athlete well-being during an international rugby series.
Article in Biology of sport, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recovery Strategies in Elite-Level Male Rugby Union Players and Positional Considerations: A Scoping Review.Sports medicine - open · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rugby training and competition both impose a stress or training load (TL) affecting athlete well-being. Current understanding of the TL dose-response and time-lagged changes (i.e., delayed effects) in well-being is limited. We addressed these gaps using data from a 3-week international series. Twenty-two elite male rugby players were assessed 4-5 days a week for daily TL and well-being (i.e., mood, stress, soreness, fatigue, sleep quality). A distributed lag non-linear model was used to estimate the TL effect, at the within-person mean (358 A.U), +1SD (576 A.U) and +2SD (794 A.U), on well-being at 0-5 lag days. Average daily TL declined by -38% and -45% in weeks two and three (vs. week 1), respectively, with weekly fluctuations of +27% to -58% (vs. Monday training). The well-being subscales oscillated around a stable baseline. Compared to mean-centered scores, a significant decline in mood and sleep quality (-0.6 to -2.0 units; -9 to -30%) emerged at all TLs, with a delayed shift at higher loads. Elevated stress, soreness, and fatigue responses (up to 3.7 units; 76%) emerged with increasing daily TLs, including a biphasic rise in stress and fatigue at higher loads. In conclusion, we gained detailed insight into physical stress and the temporal sequence of well-being during an international rugby series. Different daily TLs predicted adverse well-being responses (i.e., declining mood and sleep quality, rise in stress, soreness, fatigue) that varied in lag timing, duration, and magnitude. Explicating these associations can assist weekly planning and strategies to optimize recovery, performance, and team success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.