ArticleDEN open2025
Effectiveness of a novel traction device (TRACMOTION) for endoscopic submucosal dissection using a scissor-type knife: An animal pilot study and clinical experiences.
Article in DEN open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The efficacy and safety of traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection in early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- A network meta-analysis of strategies for endoscopic submucosal dissection procedures from the perspectives of efficacy, duration and safety.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Feasibility and performance evaluation of a robotic steerable endoscopic submucosal dissection knife (with video).Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A newly developed articulated through-the-scope traction device, TRACMOTION, has been used clinically for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, there are few reports on the characteristics of this device and the lesion types for which it is most effective. Therefore, we evaluated its optimal use, efficacy, and safety clinically in animals. Subsequently, we confirmed the safety and efficacy of ESD using this device in humans. Two live swine were used; one underwent conventional ESD (C-ESD) and the other traction-assisted ESD (T-ESD). To examine the traction effect at each resection site, three ESD ulcers (greater curvature/anterior wall/posterior wall) with a diameter of approximately 40 mm were created in each swine. Based on our preliminary experiments, scissor-type and needle-type knives were used in the T-ESD and C-ESD groups, respectively. The primary endpoint was the resection speed, and the secondary endpoint was the degree of muscle layer damage. T-ESD was faster than C-ESD on the posterior wall, similar to the greater curvature, and T-ESD was slower than C-ESD on the anterior wall. There were no cases of intraoperative perforations. Obvious muscle layer damage was observed in post-C-ESD wounds on the anterior wall. The submucosal layer was retained in all post-T-ESD wounds. Although this study showed that ESD with TRACMOTION may be safe and effective, it is necessary to consider that it may be unsuitable for some lesions. This may be due to device characteristics and requires further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.