Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758158›Full record

ArticleDEN open2025

Clinicopathological evaluation of the efficacy of endoscopic treatment for sessile serrated lesions comparing endoscopic mucosal resection, cold snare polypectomy, and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection.

Kaizo Kagemoto, Koichi Okamoto, Yasuyuki Okada, Motoko Sei, Shota Fujimoto, Mai Yagi, Takeshi Mitsuhashi, Hiroyuki Ueda, Takanori Yoshimoto, Takanori Kashihara and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Kaizo KagemotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3524-2053
Koichi OkamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Yasuyuki OkadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Motoko SeiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Shota FujimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Mai YagiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Takeshi MitsuhashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Hiroyuki UedaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Takanori YoshimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Takanori KashiharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Tomoyuki KawaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Yoshifumi KidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Yasuhiro MitsuiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Yutaka KawanoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Masahiro SogabeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Hiroshi MiyamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Yasushi SatoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Naoki MugurumaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.
Tetsuji TakayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Oncology Institute of Biomedical Sciences Tokushima University Graduate School Tokushima Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Recently, various endoscopic treatments for colorectal polyps have been reported, including cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR), in addition to EMR. However, a precise treatment strategy for sessile serrated lesions (SSL) has not been established. In this study, we analyzed the clinicopathological features of SSL resected by EMR, CSP, and UEMR to determine the most suitable treatment for SSL. Methods: A total of 92 SSL resected via EMR ( Results: The R0 resection rate significantly differed among the three groups (EMR, 73%; CSP, 42%; UEMR, 87%, Conclusions: UEMR is considered to be a suitable treatment option for SSL. CSP results were pathologically insufficient. Therefore, surveillance to evaluate local recurrence is important, and the results of further multicenter prospective studies should be referred.

Indexed as

CSPEMRinverted growthSSLUEMR

Identifiers

PMID39758158
PMCPMC11695825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.