Observational studyGlobal heart2024
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Elderly Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Observational Cohort Study.
Observational study in Global heart, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- In-Hospital mortality and determinants among myocardial infarction patients in public hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Sex-Related Differences in Predictors of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Kosovo: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Africa: A Systematic Review of Associated Outcomes.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The global trend of population aging has resulted in more frequent cardiovascular disease among seniors. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the standard of care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) without an upper age limit. Nevertheless, the outcomes are variable among studies, and data on pPCI outcomes in the elderly in Africa is scarce. Thus, we attempted to gain better insight into the outcomes of primary PCI in this age group from a single center in upper Egypt. Objective: To study the patient characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of pPCI in elderly patients presenting with STEMI in a tertiary cardiac center in upper Egypt. Methods and results: This observational cohort study was based on data from the pPCI registry in a tertiary cardiac center in upper Egypt, which included 3,627 consecutive patients who underwent pPCI between January 2014 and June 2023. The elderly were defined as those aged 70 years or older and represented 15.9% (575 patients) of the entire cohort, of whom 103 (2.8%) were octogenarians. Clinical characteristics, procedural details, and in-hospital outcomes were compared between the age groups. The elderly had a significant trend of being female and hypertensive, and having chronic kidney disease (CKD), worse Killip class, more frequent severe non-culprit vessel lesions, and left main trunk involvement. The in-hospital mortality was significantly higher than that of younger patients (14.1 vs. 4%, p = <0.001), with higher mortality in octogenarians (23.3%). Killip class ≥II was independently associated with increased hospital mortality in all study age groups. Contrast-induced nephropathy and TIMI major bleeding were also significantly higher. Conclusion: Compared to younger patients, elderly patients undergoing pPCI had a higher prevalence of hypertension and CKD and were more likely to have a worse Killip class. The radial approach was utilized less often in the elderly group. In-hospital complications and mortality, particularly among the octogenarians, were significantly higher than in younger patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.