Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758132›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Autologous Neurosensory Retinal Flap Transplantation in a Porcine Model of Retinal Hole.

Madeline E Olufsen, Jens Hannibal, Nina B Soerensen, Anders T Christiansen, Ulrik C Christensen, Grazia Pertile, David H Steel, Steffen Heegaard, Jens F Kiilgaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Madeline E OlufsenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens HannibalFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nina B SoerensenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders T ChristiansenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ulrik C ChristensenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Grazia PertileDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Verona, Italy.
David H SteelBioscience Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Steffen HeegaardDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens F KiilgaardDepartment of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Autologous retinal transplantation has been successfully employed in the treatment of large and myopic macular holes that are refractory to standard surgical treatments. Patients transplanted with a peripheral neurosensory retinal graft have shown unexpected improvements in visual acuity. The study aims to investigate if neural integration of the graft takes place in a porcine model of retinal hole. Design: Experimental animal study. Subjects: Left eyes of 10 Danish landrace pigs. Methods: The pigs underwent vitrectomy under general anesthesia, and a subretinal bleb was created within the visual streak on both sites of the optic disc. A retinal hole, approximately 1900 to 4000 microns in size, was cut temporally using a vitrector. A graft of matching size was harvested from the nasal retina. The graft was gently moved toward the retinal hole under perfluoro-n-octane and placed within it. Endolaser was applied around the donor site, and either air or oil tamponade was used. OCT and color fundus photography were performed 2 and 6 weeks after surgery. At the end of follow-up, the eyes were enucleated for histological examination, including immunohistochemical analysis with antibodies against retinal glial cells, photoreceptors, and inner retinal neurons. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome measures were the morphology of the graft and the junctional area between the host and the graft. Results: Retinal hole closure was achieved in 9 of 10 cases, with the graft remaining in situ in 6 cases. In 4 cases, OCT scans indicated preservation of the outer retinal layers, and in 2 of these cases, there was apparent integration with the adjacent host retina. Corresponding histology confirmed the preservation of the photoreceptor layer in 3 cases, but there was no evidence of graft integration with degeneration of the inner retina in all cases. The distance between the margins of the retinal hole decreased during follow-up, suggesting that the graft contracts and drags the surrounding retina toward the center. Conclusions: The outer retina of a retinal graft can be preserved, while the inner retina degenerates. No evidence of neuroretinal integration of the graft was observed. The retinal graft serves as a scaffold, promoting the centripetal migration of the edges of the hole, resulting in closure of large retinal holes. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Autologous retinal graftImmunohistochemistryPigRetinal transplantationSubretinal surgery

Identifiers

PMID39758132
PMCPMC11699102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.