Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39758082›Full record

ArticleZdravstveno varstvo2025

Exploring General Practitioner Work in Upper Austria: A Pilot Retrospective Observational Study Across Thirty Practices.

Erika Zelko, Thomas Peinbauer, Lisa Voggenberger, Fabian Bekelaer, Julia Pantoglou, Denise Stübl, Erwin Rebhandl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zdravstveno varstvo, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erika ZelkoInstitute of General Practice, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2730-9118
Thomas PeinbauerInstitute of General Practice, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6274-3979
Lisa VoggenbergerInstitute of General Practice, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8992-5840
Fabian BekelaerInstitute of General Practice, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7015-4658
Julia PantoglouInstitute of General Practice, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9772-6961
Denise StüblInstitute of General Practice, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2647-4345
Erwin RebhandlInstitute of General Practice, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040 Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2851-1974

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigates the differences in patient care across various organisational forms of general practitioners (GPs) in Upper Austria. Methods: Data was collected from GPs across Upper Austria, examining patient demographics, prescription patterns, staff employment, services offered and the proximity of practices to hospitals. The variability in recording patient visit reasons was also analysed. Results: Of the 30 participating GPs (Response Rate 5.1%), 17 worked in single practices, 7 in group practices, and 6 in PHC units. In our sample, single practices tend to prescribe more medications for chronic conditions. Group practices and PHC centres are more prevalent in areas with larger populations, offer online appointment bookings more frequently and employ more staff. The study also highlights variability in documenting patient visit reasons, emphasising the need for standardised documentation practices. The most common reasons for the patient to contact their GP, based on ICPC-2 categories, were general and non-specific, respiratory and locomotor problems, and the most common chronic diseases seen in the practice are cardiovascular, endocrine diseases and locomotor system problems. The most common therapeutic procedures were counselling and prescription of medication. Conclusion: Our study, the first of its kind, reveals significant insights into the variability and adaptability of general medicine outpatient practices in Upper Austria, highlighting the need for improved diagnosis coding at the primary care level.

Indexed as

OrganisationalPrimary healthcare, general/family medicineScope of activitiestype of practiceUpper Austria

Identifiers

PMID39758082
PMCPMC11694631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.